<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 50 Day Moving Average Proves To Be Strong Resistance; For A Real Bottom To Happen The Public Has To Give Up&#8211;We Are No Where Near That Yet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigwavetrading.net/the-50-day-moving-average-proves-to-be-strong-resistance-for-a-real-bottom-to-happen-the-public-has-to-give-up-we-are-no-where-near-that-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigwavetrading.net/the-50-day-moving-average-proves-to-be-strong-resistance-for-a-real-bottom-to-happen-the-public-has-to-give-up-we-are-no-where-near-that-yet/</link>
	<description>Free stock market commentary by Joshua Hayes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 07:30:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hyde</title>
		<link>http://www.bigwavetrading.net/the-50-day-moving-average-proves-to-be-strong-resistance-for-a-real-bottom-to-happen-the-public-has-to-give-up-we-are-no-where-near-that-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigwavetrading.net/the-50-day-moving-average-proves-to-be-strong-resistance-for-a-real-bottom-to-happen-the-public-has-to-give-up-we-are-no-where-near-that-yet/#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>Man, I normally chuckle at Cramer&#039;s inconsistencies, but this week had me shaking my head in disbelief. It&#039;s pretty hard to lend credence to this guy.

Aug 4th - &quot;Cramer: Cisco&#039;s a No-go. Jim Cramer predicts that this stock has little growth potential.&quot;

Aug 8th : &quot;Tech&#039;s blooming. It is anticipating the annual fall run -- just as predictable as the big salmon runs -- and people are jumping on some old stalwarts: Cisco (CSCO - commentary - Cramer&#039;s Take), Dell (DELL - commentary - Cramer&#039;s Take), Hewlett-Packard (HPQ - commentary - Cramer&#039;s Take), Microsoft (MSFT - 
commentary - Cramer&#039;s Take) and Intel (INTC - commentary - Cramer&#039;s Take). These stocks all have somewhat compelling stories, and I agree with the buying. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I normally chuckle at Cramer&#8217;s inconsistencies, but this week had me shaking my head in disbelief. It&#8217;s pretty hard to lend credence to this guy.</p>
<p>Aug 4th &#8211; &#8220;Cramer: Cisco&#8217;s a No-go. Jim Cramer predicts that this stock has little growth potential.&#8221;</p>
<p>Aug 8th : &#8220;Tech&#8217;s blooming. It is anticipating the annual fall run &#8212; just as predictable as the big salmon runs &#8212; and people are jumping on some old stalwarts: Cisco (CSCO &#8211; commentary &#8211; Cramer&#8217;s Take), Dell (DELL &#8211; commentary &#8211; Cramer&#8217;s Take), Hewlett-Packard (HPQ &#8211; commentary &#8211; Cramer&#8217;s Take), Microsoft (MSFT &#8211;<br />
commentary &#8211; Cramer&#8217;s Take) and Intel (INTC &#8211; commentary &#8211; Cramer&#8217;s Take). These stocks all have somewhat compelling stories, and I agree with the buying. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.bigwavetrading.net/the-50-day-moving-average-proves-to-be-strong-resistance-for-a-real-bottom-to-happen-the-public-has-to-give-up-we-are-no-where-near-that-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigwavetrading.net/the-50-day-moving-average-proves-to-be-strong-resistance-for-a-real-bottom-to-happen-the-public-has-to-give-up-we-are-no-where-near-that-yet/#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>Comments I did not get the dates wrong on the longs and shorts analysis page as I used random different dates in February and April....all the same thing... FLAT AND TRENDLESS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments I did not get the dates wrong on the longs and shorts analysis page as I used random different dates in February and April&#8230;.all the same thing&#8230; FLAT AND TRENDLESS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
